Unfortunately the radio silence remained, the good news is that even more cool stuff is on its way*!
For now, we briefly mention a very beautiful interpretation of -tensors.
Given some vectorspace , let be the set of linear endomorphisms from to .
Indeed, for finite-dimensional vector spaces one can just think of these maps as being parametrized by matrices.
Now, we recall that -tensors are multilinear maps which take an element of and its dual space and map it to some real number, that is, .
The claim is that for finite-dimensional the set is isomorphic to the set of -tensors . This is rather intuitive to see, let and , then, we can write and think of as a matrix. This can be formalized, as is done here by showing there is a bijective map .
So, we can identify any with some , that is . Similarly, we can fix and identify with a linear map in the dual space, that is . Regardless, both represent the same tensor evaluation, hence
which is indeed the standard dual map definition.
Now we use this relation, recall that discrete-time linear systems are nothing more than maps , that is, linear endomorphims, usually on . Using the tensor interpretation we recover what is sometimes called the ‘‘dual system’’ to , namely (suggestive notation indeed). Using more traditional notation for the primal: and dual: system, we recover that . Then, let and for and being a left- and right-eigenvector of , respectively. We see that this implies that , for the eigenvalue corresponding to and the eigenvalue corresponding to . Hence, in general, the eigenspaces of and are generically orthogonal.
In other words, we recover the geometric interpretation of mapping -volumes under versus .
* See this talk by Daniel.
|